Amy Coney Barrett initially failed to disclose talks on Roe v. Wade hosted by anti-abortion groups on Senate paperwork

 Amy Coney Barrett initially failed to disclose talks on Roe v. Wade hosted by anti-abortion groups on Senate paperwork

Barrett, President Donald Trump’s nominee to succeed Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, gave the talks — a lecture and a seminar — in 2013 in her capacity as a law professor at the University of Notre Dame. The seminar was co-sponsored by the school’s Right to Life club and constitutional studies minor, and the lecture was held by the law school’s Jus Vitae club. CNN’s KFile found advertisements for two lectures on social media and in a weekly Notre Dame faculty newsletter.
Late on Friday night, hours after this story published, the Senate Judiciary Committee released a supplemental update to Barrett’s committee questionnaire that includes the lecture and seminar, as well as a paid advertisement she signed that criticized Roe v. Wade and reaffirmed support for Notre Dame’s “commitment to the right to life.” The release came after CNN asked the White House about the advertisement earlier on Friday.

It is not known what was said in the two events, though both centered on abortion court cases. In a separate instance, CNN’s KFile found a publicized talk that Barrett gave to coincide with the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade — a seminar Barrett disclosed in her Senate paperwork — was removed by the university from YouTube in 2014. A school spokesman told CNN the video is now lost.

Barrett’s confirmation to the Supreme Court would strengthen its current conservative majority — creating a 6-3 bloc of conservative justices — and could limit abortion access.
Barrett’s initial failure to disclose the two events also raises questions about whether the questionnaire is complete or whether there will be any consequences from the Republican-led Senate Judiciary Committee, which oversees her confirmation hearing. Past chairmen of the powerful committee have halted the nomination process after judicial nominees omitted information in their Senate paperwork but under committee Chairman Lindsey Graham that scenario is unlikely.
The committee has slated a hearing for Barrett on October 12 in an effort to confirm her by the full Senate before the election.
Senate Democrats on the Judiciary Committee sent a letter to the Justice Department this week that said Barrett did omit materials concerning Roe v. Wade and asked if Barrett omitted any more materials after the National Review reported that Barrett signed a letter on a “right to life” ad in 2006 that called for the end of the landmark legal decision.

White House spokesperson Judd Deere told CNN in an email, “Judge Barrett submitted her lengthy Senate Judiciary Questionnaire, spoke with an overwhelming majority of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and continues to be transparent throughout her confirmation process. She looks forward to answering questions from the Senators next week.”

A spokesperson for the Senate Judiciary Committee told CNN “it is a very normal practice” for Supreme Court nominees to update their questionnaire, noting that several current Supreme Court justices also supplied updated copies.

Justice Breyer reminisces about RBG, ducks questions about Barrett

CNN reached out multiple times to Barrett through her law chambers but did not get a response.

While Barrett’s association with anti-abortion groups has come under scrutiny — including signing a Right to Life ad in 2006 — little has been examined about her work with anti-abortion groups at Notre Dame. Barrett gave the talks hosted by the anti-abortion student groups while she was also a member of the Notre Dame chapter University Faculty for Life, which staunchly opposes abortion.

In 2016, the group sent a letter asking the university to rescind an award honored to then-Vice President Joe Biden in recognition for his work as an American Catholic. The group called it “a scandalous violation of the University’s moral responsibility (as the American bishops wrote in 2004) never to honor those who act in defiance of fundamental moral principles about the sanctity of life” and attacked his views on abortion.

Barrett initially failed to disclose two seminars she gave students on Roe v. Wade

In April 2013, Barrett gave a small hour-long seminar “for students on changes to law and life for women after Roe v. Wade” entitled “Being a Woman After Roe.”
According to a copy of the Facebook event advertising the seminar, spots were limited to 15 students. A student publication promoted the event as an informal seminar, small group setting in which students can learn more from faculty members who oppose abortion.
“The Right to Life Seminar Series was begun as an opportunity for students and professors to discuss a variety of issues related to human life and dignity,” an advertisement for the event reads.
Democrats look to avoid giving GOP fresh election-year material in Supreme Court spectacle
The conservative judge also did not disclose that in November 2013 she spoke to Jus Vitae, the law school’s Right to Life club, on “The Supreme Court’s Abortion Jurisprudence.” The law school advertised the lecture as focusing on Roe v. Wade and the cases that followed it, including cases that were being litigated on the lower courts at that time.

The lecture Barrett did disclose was entitled “Roe at 40: The Supreme Court, Abortion, and the Culture War that Followed,” taking place in January 2013 and open to the university community. It was co-sponsored by the university’s Constitutional Studies minor.

However, video for the lecture, which CNN’s KFile found on the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine was advertised by the school as being available on YouTube, was removed by the user in 2014, according to a YouTube spokesperson.
Of 11 lectures publicized as available to watch on the school’s event, only Barrett’s was removed from YouTube.

After CNN inquired to obtain video of the event, a university spokesperson, Dennis K. Brown, told CNN, “We have checked with the organizer of the event [sic] have no information on what has become of the video of that lecture.”

Several on-campus publications covered the event and Barrett’s remarks at the time.

The Observer, Notre Dame’s student newspaper, wrote that Barrett said, ”I think it is very unlikely at this point that the court is going to overturn Roe as curbed by [Planned Parenthood v.] Casey. The fundamental element, that the woman has a right to choose abortion, will probably stand,” she said.
The Irish Rover, a student publication covering Catholic identity, quoted Barrett as saying, “whether or not Roe gets overturned is irrelevant,” saying the question of abortion would return to the state level and could still be legal in certain states.

Anti-Biden letter

As Barrett gave talks on abortion to groups associated with the on-campus Right to Life groups, Barrett was also a member of the university’s chapter of the University Faculty for Life from the group’s founding in 2010 until 2016, according to her Senate paperwork.

Notre Dame president faces university backlash following Covid-19 diagnosis
While she was a member of the group, the group unanimously passed a resolution for a letter calling on the university to rescind an award given to then-Vice President Biden because of his beliefs on abortion.

“Notre Dame claims to award the Laetare Medal ‘annually to an American Catholic in recognition of outstanding service to Church and society,'” the letter reads. “But our Faculty for Life Chapter agrees with Bishop Kevin Rhoades that the awarding of the Laetare Medal to Vice-President Biden is a scandalous violation of the University’s moral responsibility (as the American bishops wrote in 2004) never to honor those who act in defiance of fundamental moral principles about the sanctity of life.”

The faculty letter attacks Biden’s position on abortion for not wanting to “impose” the Catholic Church’s teachings on abortion upon a woman or a doctor, supporting the death penalty and for rejecting “the truth that human life begins at conception.” It also states that public officials like Biden have “an especially grave duty to preserve” life.

This story has been updated to add that Barrett’s questionnaire was updated with these documents after the story published.

Source link

0 Reviews

Related post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: