The slate of names, which were released by Republican Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham and the panel’s top Democrat, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, hail from an assortment of backgrounds. The Republican lineup is poised to speak to Barrett’s legal credentials, while Democrats appear to have chosen witnesses that can bring a personal message to the sweeping issues that have defined the first three hearings.
Two Republican-tapped witnesses, Randal Noel and Pamela Roberts from the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary, will kick off the witness list Thursday. Noel wrote in a letter to the panel earlier this week that the American Bar Association found Barrett to be “well qualified” to serve on the high court.
Saikrishna Prakash, a professor of law at the University of Virginia, and Amanda Rauh-Bieri, who clerked for Barrett on the 7th Circuit, will also testify along with Laura Wolk, who was a student of Barrett’s at Notre Dame Law School.
Stacy Staggs, a mother of 7-year-old twins who have multiple pre-existing conditions and rely on the Affordable Care Act, will discuss “the devastating effects on her family if the Supreme Court overturns” the ACA, Feinstein said in a statement.
And the CEO of Care Free Medical, Dr. Farhan Bhatti, will similarly discuss “the harm to his patients if the Supreme Court overturns the Affordable Care Act,” Feinstein said.
On the issue of abortion, Democrats have tapped Crystal Good, who “fought for her right to obtain an abortion at age 16.” She is set to speak on “the importance of reproductive rights and justice.”
Kristen Clarke, the president of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, will speak on voting rights and civil rights protected under the Constitution.
The witness testimonies will cap a contentious week of hearings that have seen Barrett repeatedly decline to wade into a slate of issues.
Beyond health care and abortion, Democrats have questioned Barrett on her positions and writings on gun rights, voting rights and whether she would recuse herself on election disputes involving the President that might reach the high court.
“There’s nothing unconstitutional about this process. This is a vacancy that’s occurred through a tragic loss of a great woman, and we’re going to fill that vacancy with another great woman,” Graham said Monday.
“The bottom line here is that the Senate is doing its duty constitutionally.”
CNN’s Jeremy Herb contributed to this report.